| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Journal of Wound Management and Research > Volume 21(1); 2025 > Article
Kang, Kang, Hong, Ryu, Lee, Choi, Chung, Park, and Yang: Influence of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell-Enhanced Acellular Dermal Matrix on Capsule Formation in Rat Models

Abstract

Background

The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in breast reconstruction can inhibit capsular contracture, increasing the success rate of surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can effectively suppress foreign body reaction, which is a major cause of capsular contracture. This study aimed to elucidate the synergistic effects of combining ADSCs with ADM on capsule formation, utilizing a rat model.

Methods

The study utilized 12 rats, equally divided into two experimental groups. Group A received silicone implants covered with ADM, while Group B was implanted with silicone prostheses wrapped in ADM, pre-seeded with ADSCs. Capsule formation was assessed through visual examination, histological analysis, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at 4 and 8 weeks post-implantation.

Results

At 4 weeks, the mean capsular thickness was 177.16 μm in Group A and 170.76 μm in Group B; at 8 weeks, it was 196.69 μm in Group A and 176.10 μm in Group B. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in capsule thickness between the groups (P>0.05). Histological findings indicated that Group A had more inflammatory cells and collagen fibers and reduced angiogenesis. RT-PCR showed that angiogenesis-promoting gene expression in Group B was 14% higher at 4 weeks and 156% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group A.

Conclusion

Although no statistically significant reduction in capsule thickness was observed, ADSC-seeded implants showed histological features associated with reduced inflammation and enhanced angiogenesis, suggesting potential benefits in capsule formation management.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and its prevalence is increasing every year [1]. Accordingly, since total mastectomy is the standard procedure for treating breast cancer, autologous tissue or implants are widely utilized for breast reconstruction. When opting for autologous tissue preservation, implant reconstruction offers the distinct advantage of minimal scarring as there is no need for additional incisions. As a result, the increasing use of implants in breast reconstruction has led to a growing focus on developing techniques to minimize complications such as capsular contracture, with various studies currently underway [2].
Delayed breast reconstruction using implants was first introduced in 1961, after which immediate reconstruction techniques were reported, inserting implants directly under the chest wall skin flaps after mastectomy [3,4]. However, this subcutaneous implant insertion technique led to numerous complications such as implant exposure, capsular contracture, and implant displacement. Later, the submuscular implant insertion technique was introduced, where the entire implant was placed under the pectoralis major muscle. This method also presented several issues, prompting the development of partial muscle coverage or dual plane approaches to overcome its drawbacks.
With the development of implant technology and the advent of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), an improved dual plane surgical method was devised. In various studies, ADM has been shown to reduce the rate of capsular contracture by downregulating the expression of myofibroblasts, fibroblasts, vascularity markers, macrophages, TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor beta-1), and PDGF-B (platelet derived growth factor subunit B) in capsular tissue, resulting in a more natural and aesthetically pleasing breast shape and providing a different layer of soft tissue coverage between the implant and the skin flap, thus increasing the success rate of breast reconstruction [3-5].
Notably, one study has investigated the therapeutic effects of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in improving immunological tolerance, where they mitigate host reactions to foreign bodies, which is one of the major causes of capsular contracture [6]. As ADSCs lack HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR), the main antigen of the major histocompatibility complex, they do not induce immune rejection even after allogeneic or heterogeneous cultivation and transplantation, effectively suppressing foreign body reactions that occur in capsular contracture [7]. In addition, ADSCs have been demonstrated to promote angiogenesis and help rapid attachment to the recipient tissue [8].
This study aimed to investigate whether the application of ADSCs to ADM could reduce the incidence of capsular contracture in a rat model of breast reconstruction. Specifically, we sought to evaluate the extent to which ADSCs can enhance the anti-inflammatory and angiogenic properties of ADM, thereby contributing to improved outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Methods

The animal experiment was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Approval number: DGMIF-21081805-00).

Materials

Sprague-Dawley rats

A total of 26 Sprague-Dawley rats (female, 7 weeks old), each weighing over 200 g, were purchased from the Yeongnam branch of Orient Bio Inc. After a 1-week acclimation period, 12 rats were selected and divided into four groups of three rats each, ensuring equal mean weights.

Adipose-derived stem cells

Consent was obtained for the experimental use of ADSCs from a 44-year-old female donor scheduled for liposuction in the abdomen, with no underlying disease. Tissue containing adipocytes was harvested using a suction cannula connected to a 10 mL syringe, following the Coleman technique. The tissue obtained from the lower abdomen through liposuction was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for three minutes to separate and remove oily fractions and the serum, and pure adipose tissue samples were extracted. The pure fat samples were digested with a collagenase solution at 37 °C for 1 hour, followed by neutralization with DMEM/F-12 medium. Subsequently, the solution was centrifuged at 300 ×g for 5 minutes to remove the supernatant, and the cell pellet was washed with phosphate buffered saline and centrifuged again. The washed cells were resuspended in DMEM/F-12 medium and seeded into flask, then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. When the cells reached 80% to 90% confluence, they were treated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) to detach the cells for the next passage. A total of three passages were performed in this study. The cells were used for in-vivo animal experiments.

Methods

An animal model was established with 12 rats (7-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats: range, 212.56–234.23 g; mean weight, 226.75 g). After 2 cm-long incisions were made at 4 cm from the base of the tail towards the head, along the vertebral center line of the rats, a silicone implant with a diameter of 2 cm and a height of 1 cm, specifically manufactured for animal experiments, was inserted. The experimental animals were divided into two groups as follows (Fig. 1): Group A, insertion of silicone implant and ADM; Group B, insertion of silicone implant and ADM with ADSC seeding.

Insertion of silicone implant

Following intraperitoneal anesthesia with Zoletil 50 (30 mg/kg; Virbac) and Rompun (10 mg/kg; Elanco), a silicone implant (2 cm in diameter, 1 cm in height; Hans Biomed Co.), specifically designed for animal experiments, was inserted.

Insertion of ADM

After insertion of the silicone implant, a square-shaped ADM (3 cm in width, 3 cm in length, and 2 mm thick; CGBio), manufactured for animal experiments, was inserted. The ADM was positioned to fully cover the anterior surface of the silicone implant and was subsequently secured in place using sutures with 4-0 nylon.

ADSC seeding

ADSCs (1.0×1,055 cells) were applied to each rat in Group B. To ensure uniform application, the cultured ADSCs were suspended in 2 mL of Tisseel (Baxter), a fibrin sealant, and sprayed evenly onto the fixed ADM.

Clinical symptom observation and weight measurement

General symptoms were observed once daily from the start date of the experiment to the end of the experiment, and weight measurements were performed once a week.

Evaluation

Visual evaluation

After transplantation, to examine capsule formation around the silicone implant and ADM, the experimental animals were euthanized, and the surgical site was incised again and photographed with a digital camera. The formation and thickness of the capsule were visually evaluated at weeks 4 and 8 into the experiment.

Capsular thickness

Capsular thickness was evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, using a microscope at weeks 4 and 8 of the experiment. Capsule thickness was measured at five different locations in each specimen and mean values were calculated.

Histopathological evaluation

For histopathological evaluation, a random selection of three animals from each group at 4 and 8 weeks into the experiment were euthanized. Incisions were performed as previously described, and the silicone implant, ADM, and surrounding capsule were harvested. Subsequently, the capsule tissue harvested from center of the dorsal aspect was trimmed to obtain a tissue block through a series of processes: each block was stained with H&E stain and Masson’s trichrome stain, and fibrous tissue, granulomatous tissue, angiogenesis, and inflammatory reactions were observed using an optical microscope.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Using tissue blocks obtained at 4 and 8 weeks, the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), matrix metallopeptidase-2 (MMP-2), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) were measured and confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). These genes were selected because they play crucial roles in angiogenesis, inflammation, and the formation of fibrotic tissue, all of which are key processes in capsular contracture development. VEGFA is involved in promoting angiogenesis, HIF-1α is associated with the response to hypoxia and fibrosis, TNF-α is a major pro-inflammatory cytokine, and MMP-2 and TIMP-2 are critical regulators of extracellular matrix remodeling.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp.), and an independent samples t-test was conducted. When performing the multiple t-tests, Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust the significance level, reducing the probability of errors from multiple comparisons. Capsule thicknesses were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

To assess normal growth progression, the body weight of the Sprague-Dawley rats was measured weekly. During the experiment, the silicone implant of one rat in Group A was exposed; however, the rat survived until the end of the experiment. No obvious complications were observed in the other rats, and all of them showed normal growth. At the start of the experiment, the mean weight of Group A was 227.04±10.34 g, and 228.35±9.45 g in Group B. At 4 weeks, the mean weights of rats in Group A and Group B were 337.45±18.34 g and 323.83± 16.78 g, respectively. At 8 weeks, the mean weights of rats in Group A and Group B were 360.75±16.75 g and 349.41±15.77 g, respectively. No statistical difference was observed in the growth of the groups (Fig. 2).

Visual observation

In each group, three rats were euthanized at 4 and 8 weeks, and capsule samples were harvested. Visual observation confirmed that the capsule samples of rats in Group A were thicker than those of Group B (Fig. 3).

Capsular thickness

At 4 weeks, the mean capsular thickness was 177.16 μm in Group A and 170.76 μm in Group B. By 8 weeks, it was 196.69 μm in Group A and 176.10 μm in Group B (Fig. 4). The Mann-Whitney U test results showed no statistically significant differences in capsule thickness between the groups (P>0.05).

Histological findings

H&E staining

Capsule samples harvested from each group at 4 and 8 weeks were subjected to H&E staining and were observed under an optical microscope. More inflammatory cells were observed in Group A than in Group B both at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and reduced angiogenesis was observed in Group A (Fig. 5).

Trichrome staining

Capsule samples harvested from each group at 4 and 8 weeks were stained with Masson’s trichrome stain and observed using an optical microscope. In comparison with Group B, Group A had a larger stained area of collagen fibers with greater density at weeks 4 and 8 (Fig. 6).

RT-PCR test

RT-PCR was performed using capsule samples harvested from each group at 4 and 8 weeks to measure gene expression levels. For VEGFA, the expression level in Group B was 14% higher at 4 weeks and 156% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group A (P=0.0321). For HIF-1α, the expression level in Group A was 2% higher at 4 weeks and 89% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group B (P=0.0266). For TNF-α, the expression level in Group A was 18% higher at 4 weeks and 348% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group B (P=0.0133). For MMP-2, the expression level in Group A was 23% higher at 4 weeks and 63% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group B (P=0.0193). For TIMP-2, the expression level in Group A was 53% higher at 4 weeks and 52% higher at 8 weeks compared to Group B (P=0.0433, P=0.0271) (Figs. 7, 8).

Discussion

During breast reconstruction, the placement of an implant typically triggers capsule formation, a critical component of the host’s response to foreign bodies. However, excessive capsule formation, commonly known as capsular contracture, can present with a variety of clinical symptoms that correlate with its severity. These symptoms include abnormal sensations, pain, breast shape deformation, and capsule hardening, causing significant discomfort to the patient [9]. Various theories exist on the causes, including the anatomical position of the implant, asymptomatic infection or inflammation, bacterial biofilm, and material properties of the implant surface [10]. Though many animal experiments and clinical studies have been conducted to identify the causes and mechanisms of capsular contracture, they remain unclear [11,12]. One widely supported hypothesis suggests that capsular contracture is related to a foreign body reaction, where an inflammatory response and collagen fiber deposition lead to excessive fibrosis in the capsule formed as a normal defense mechanism against the implanted foreign material [11,12].
ADSCs, which have recently attracted considerable attention, are relatively easy to harvest; patients report less discomfort during ADSC harvesting compared to the more invasive process of bone marrow stem cell extraction. Meanwhile, ADSCs are known to have different differentiation potencies depending on the method of harvesting; specifically, harvesting through direct excision or the Coleman technique with centrifugation can obtain the most ADSCs [13]. Harvested ADSCs exhibit immunomodulatory properties, but do not affect various immune cells including T cells, B cells, and antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, they do not elicit immune rejection responses even after allogeneic or xenogeneic transplantation [14,15]. In addition, studies reported that ADSCs could reduce host reaction to foreign bodies, preventing capsular contracture [16,17]. For this reason, we hypothesized that when ADSCs are applied to ADM, they would suppress foreign body reactions and further enhance the capsular contracture inhibitory effect of ADM; we planned and conducted this study based on this hypothesis.
In this study, visual evaluation confirmed that capsule samples were thicker at 8 weeks in Group A, which was not treated with ADSCs. However, statistical analysis showed no significant difference in capsule thickness between Group A and Group B. Similarly, at 4 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference in capsule thickness between the two groups. H&E staining revealed that the degree of angiogenesis was lower in Group A than in Group B at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and the number of inflammatory cells was higher in Group A than in Group B. This result may be attributed to the ability of ADSCs to suppress the immune process and preventing foreign body reactions. In addition, Masson’s trichrome staining demonstrated a higher density of collagen fibers in Group A than in Group B at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Capsular contracture is characterized by the presence of dense, thick, cable-like bundles of collagen fibers. The study results suggest that ADSCs effectively inhibit the formation of these collagen fibers, which are the primary structural component of capsules [18]. This outcome may be associated with the inhibition of the inflammatory response.
RT-PCR was performed to quantitatively evaluate inflammatory reactions and angiogenesis. In comparison with Group A, Group B had a higher expression level of VEGFA, known as a prominent factor in angiogenesis. The higher expression level of VEGFA in Group B is consistent with the result of H&E staining showing more new blood vessels in Group B compared to Group A [19]. Meanwhile, the expression level of HIF-1α was lower in Group B than in Group A. HIF-1α is a protein expressed in the absence of oxygen, preventing cell death and contributing to the development and progression of fibrosis; several studies have found high levels of HIF-1α in the capsule samples of patients whose capsular contracture has progressed [20]. The lower expression level of HIF-1α observed in the ADSC group compared with the control group is consistent with the effectiveness of ADSCs in inhibiting capsule formation.
Next, the expression level of TNF-α was lower in Group B than in Group A. TNF-α is one of the main factors that induce an inflammatory response, and it is known that it promotes the formation of capsular contracture when its expression level increases [21]. It was confirmed that the expression level of TNF-α was significantly lower in Group B compared to Group A. This finding suggests that ADSCs may be effective in preventing capsular contracture and deterioration. Both MMP-2 and TIMP-2 showed lower expression levels in Group B than in Group A. While the precise mechanisms of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in capsular contracture are not fully elucidated, these molecules are recognized as significant contributors to the development of this condition [22]. The significantly lower expression levels of both MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in the ADSC group suggest that ADSCs may contribute to the prevention of capsular contracture.
In this study, compared with the group that received only silicone implants and ADM, the group that received ADSCs as well showed a reduced inflammatory response, increased angiogenesis, and suppressed collagen fiber production. These results are consistent with the effects of ADSCs observed in previous studies. It is presumed that the reduced inflammatory response and suppression of collagen fiber production induce a decrease in the host reaction to foreign bodies, and increased angiogenesis leads to rapid attachment to the recipient tissue, effectively suppressing foreign body reactions, which are widely supported as a major cause of capsular contracture.
This study has several limitations. Primarily, the sample size of the experimental groups was limited. Although statistically significant results were obtained and the possibility of clinical applications was demonstrated, further experiments are warranted with a larger sample size to increase the significance of the results. Second, further research is needed regarding the number of ADSCs to be applied. Though 1.0×105 ADSCs were applied to each animal in this study, based on existing literature [11], it is necessary to increase the efficiency of treatment by optimizing the number of cells applied. In addition, the experiment should be conducted by harvesting samples according to the stage of capsular contracture following the Baker classification. Third, previous studies conducted on rat models have shown that capsular contracture can be observed and assessed within an 8-week period [23]. However, in clinical human studies, the observation periods typically range from 6 months to 1 year to fully evaluate the progression and severity of capsular contracture. Fourth, most markers observed in this study were involved in the acute inflammatory phase. There was a lack of evaluation of cells or markers related to the formation of fibrosis. Although the study’s initial background mentioned the direct suppression of immune cells, this evaluation was not performed.
According to Muehlberg et al. [24], the use of stem cells in animal experiments can induce or promote the progression of breast cancer. However, in another study, when stem cells were used clinically, there was no significant difference in the growth or recurrence of breast cancer [25]. Therefore, when using stem cells in breast reconstruction, studies on the progression and recurrence of breast cancer should also be conducted.
This animal study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ADSCs in augmenting the preventive effects of ADM against capsular contracture during breast reconstruction with silicone implants. We were able to assess the histological changes and conducted a quantitative evaluation of factors influenced by ADSCs on capsular formation. The results demonstrated that ADSCs effectively suppressed inflammatory responses and inhibited the formation of collagen fibers, the main components of the capsule, while also promoting angiogenesis. These findings suggest that ADSCs could be sufficiently effective in preventing capsular contracture when applied clinically.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Surgical procedure. (A) Incision and creation of implant pocket. (B) Silicone implant insertion. (C) Acellular dermal matrix insertion and fixation. (D) Adipose-derived stem cell seeding with fibrin sealant.
jwmr-2024-02964f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Changes in body weight of each group. The body weight of Group A at the beginning of the experiment was 227.04±10.34 g, while that of Group B was 228.35±9.45 g. At postoperative week 4, Group A was 337.45±18.34 g and Group B was 323.83±16.78 g. At postoperative week 8, Group A was 360.75±16.75 g and Group B was 349.41±15.77 g. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Visual evaluation (digital camera). Silicone implants were placed along the midline of the spine, approximately 4 cm cephalad to the base of the tail. At week 4 of the experiment after insertion of the silicone implant, there was no visual difference in the thickness of the capsules of Group A (A) and Group B (B). At week 8 of the experiment after insertion of the silicone implant, the thickness of the capsule of Group A (C) was visibly thicker than that of Group B (D). ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Capsular thickness. At 4 weeks, the mean capsular thickness was 177.16 μm in Group A and 170.76 μm in Group B. At 8 weeks, it was 196.69 μm in Group A and 176.10 μm in Group B. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Representative histologic sections of capsules are shown. The sections were stained with H&E stain (×200). More active angiogenesis and fewer inflammatory cells were observed in Group B than in Group A. (A) Group A, 4 weeks after surgery. (B) Group B, 4 weeks after surgery. (C) Group A, 8 weeks after surgery. (D) Group B, 8 weeks after surgery. Blue arrow indicates vessel and yellow arrow indicates lymphocyte. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
Representative images of Masson’s trichrome staining. Representative histologic sections of capsules. The sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome stain (×200). The density of collagen fibers was lower in Group B than in Group A. (A) Group A, 4 weeks after surgery. (B) Group B, 4 weeks after surgery. (C) Group A, 8 weeks after surgery. (D) Group B, 8 weeks after surgery. Yellow arrow indicates collagen fiber. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f6.jpg
Fig. 7.
RT-PCR analysis of each group at 4 weeks. VEGFA expression in Group B increased in 14% compared to Group A. HIF-1α expression in Group A increased in 2% compared to Group B. TNF-α expression in Group A increased in 18% compared to Group B. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 expression in Group A increased in 23%, 53% compared to Group B. RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; MMP-2, matrix metallopeptidase-2; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2; ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f7.jpg
Fig. 8.
RT-PCR analysis of each group at 8 weeks. VEGFA expression in Group B increased in 156% compared to Group A. HIF-1α expression in Group A increased in 89% compared to Group B. TNF-α expression in Group A increased in 348% compared to Group B. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 expression in Group A increased in 63%, 52% compared to Group B. RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; MMP-2, matrix metallopeptidase-2; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2; ADM, acellular dermal matrix; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Group A, silicone implant+ADM; Group B, silicone implant+ADM+ADSC.
jwmr-2024-02964f8.jpg

References

1. American Cancer Society. Key statistics for breast cancer [Internet]. American Cancer Society; c2025 [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html.

2. Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Uroskie TW, Colen LB. History of breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2004;18:65-9.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Bloom JA, Patel K, Cohen S, et al. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: an overview of the history, technique, and reported complications. Open Access Surg 2020;13:1-9.

5. Hong HK, Kim YH, Lee JS, et al. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix. BMC Surg 2022;22:234.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Al-Ghadban S, Bunnell BA. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells: immunomodulatory effects and therapeutic potential. Physiology (Bethesda) 2020;35:125-33.
crossref pmid
7. Jin US, Hong KY, Hwang YI. Effect of adipose-derived stem cells on acellular dermal matrix engraftment in a rabbit model of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:806-13.
crossref pmid
8. Downs RK, Hedges K. An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e821.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Siggelkow W, Faridi A, Spiritus K, et al. Histological analysis of silicone breast implant capsules and correlation with capsular contracture. Biomaterials 2003;24:1101-9.
crossref pmid
10. Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, et al. The A, B and C’s of silicone breast implants: anaplastic large cell lymphoma, biofilm and capsular contracture. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:2393.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK. Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:835-42.
crossref pmid
12. Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Tierney R, et al. A novel animal model for studying silicone gel-related capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1483-91.
crossref pmid
13. Iyyanki T, Hubenak J, Liu J, et al. Harvesting technique affects adipose-derived stem cell yield. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35:467-76.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Liu J, Hou J, Li Z, et al. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in capsular contracture of implant-based breast reconstruction: a single-arm meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020;44:735-42.
crossref pmid pdf
15. Sutthiwanjampa C, Shin BH, Ryu NE, et al. Assessment of human adipose-derived stem cell on surface-modified silicone implant to reduce capsular contracture formation. Bioeng Transl Med 2021;7:e10260.
pmid pmc
16. Gurusamy N, Alsayari A, Rajasingh S, et al. Adult stem cells for regenerative therapy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2018;160:1-22.
crossref pmid
17. Han S, Sun HM, Hwang KC, et al. Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells: update on clinical utility and efficacy. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2015;25:145-52.
crossref pmid
18. Ceccarelli S, Pontecorvi P, Anastasiadou E, et al. Immunomodulatory effect of adipose-derived stem cells: the cutting edge of clinical application. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:236.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Moyer KE, Ehrlich HP. Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction: collagen fiber orientation and organization. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:680-5.
pmid
20. Claesson-Welsh L, Welsh M. VEGFA and tumour angiogenesis. J Intern Med 2013;273:114-27.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Kuo YL, Jou IM, Jeng SF, et al. Hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis for the development of breast capsular contracture. Sci Rep 2019;9:10269.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Tan KT, Wijeratne D, Shih B, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-α expression is associated with increased severity of periprosthetic breast capsular contracture. Eur Surg Res 2010;45:327-32.
crossref pmid pdf
23. Ulrich D, Lichtenegger F, Eblenkamp M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, aminoterminal propeptide of procollagen type III, and hyaluronan in sera and tissue of patients with capsular contracture after augmentation with Trilucent breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:229-36.
crossref pmid
24. Muehlberg FL, Song YH, Krohn A, et al. Tissue-resident stem cells promote breast cancer growth and metastasis. Carcinogenesis 2009;30:589-97.
crossref pmid
25. Schweizer R, Tsuji W, Gorantla VS, et al. The role of adipose-derived stem cells in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Stem Cells Int 2015;2015:120949.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Editorial Office
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University Hospital
201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Korea
TEL: +82-41-550-6285   FAX: +82-41-556-0524   E-mail: office@jwmr.org
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Wound Management Society.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next